In a dramatic and controversial meeting of WPL 2025 between the Mumbai Indians and the capital of Delhi in Vadodara, the game ended with an arbitrary contentious decision that left Mumba’s Indians feeling hard. The use of Led Zing Bails in the final ball created confusion, which led to a decision that possibly cost the Mumbai Indians the party.
The controversial final ball
Delhi Capitals needed two races of the final delivery to obtain victory. Arundhati Reddy placed the ball on the field in the field, which caused a frantic persecution and launched Harmanpreet Kaur. The ball reached the end of the Wicktkeeper with Arundhati During to make it firm. Zing’s bonds illuminated before she had completely based her bat, suggesting that she did not lack her fold at the time the stumps illuminated.
However, under the WPL game conditions, the moment when Zing’s bonds are illuminated is considered the point of dismissal, instead of when the bonds are completely evicted. This interpretation differs from the traditional Cricket Law, which establishes that the Wickt is put alone when the bonds have been permanently eliminated. According to this rule, Arundhati should have given birth, since the bonds illuminated before she was safely inside the fold. Instead, it was not ruled out, allowing Delhi Capitals to ensure a last ball victory.
Look at the final footage of the ball here:
Other arbitrators errors that hurt the Mumbai Indians
This was not the only contentious call in the game. Two previous decisions were also against Mumbai Indians in similar circumstances:
More than 18.5: Radha Yadav did not occur despite the repetitions that show that Zing’s bonds had illuminated before their bat were inside the fold. More than 17.4: Shikha Pandey also appeared less than his fold when the bonds illuminated, but was governed safely.
Am I not sure why the referee tonight has decided that Zinger’s bonds are not applicable? Once the bail lighting connection is lost, the wickt is broken! That is in the game conditions! I have seen more confusion in the last 10 minutes than ever before
️ #WPL2025 #MIVDC #WPL #Runout
– Mike Hesson (@coacheson) February 15, 2025
Have you understood the rules badly? Were those 2 runs …
#WPL
– Lisa Sthalekar (@sthalekar93) February 15, 2025
The last thing I could have done is to avoid tweeting and being happy with Win, but the man came to praise someone for making a stupid decision that also with the use of technology
https://t.co/0PTHUCBXB1
– Zufine (@
Zing Bails vs. Traditional Cricket Laws
The fundamental problem arises from the inconsistency between the traditional laws of the Cricket and the WPL game conditions. According to the laws of the Crick, a wickt is considered broken only when the bonds are permanently eliminated from the stumps.
However, the WPL rules define the moment of dismissal, since when Zing light up, which can happen a second before. This discrepancy has led to controversial decisions, and in this case, a victory will cost the Indians of Mumbai.
Also read:
According to WPL game conditions: “Where LED WICKETS are used (as supposed to The LED The lights are illuminated and the posterior frames show the permanently removed bond from the upper part of the stumps. “
Zing Bail technology has been under scrutiny in recent years, with similar debates that arise in the International Cricket. The interpretation of the WPL when it is out of mass should be reviewed to guarantee equity and consistency. If traditional laws were applied, Mumbai Indians could have forced a super or even won the game.
The anguish for the Mumbai Indians is aggravated by the fact that three crucial decisions were against them, two in the last overs and one in the last ball of the game. While Delhi Capitals celebrated an exciting victory, Mumbai’s Indians were questioning the justice of arbitrary decisions.
For more updates, follow Cricxtey on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Telegram and YouTube.