Australia had a dominant Day 4 as they set a mammoth total of 444 runs for the Men in Blue. India got off to a pretty decent start as openers shubman gill & Rohit Sharma dictated the terms. India scored 41 runs in the first 7 overs as shubman gill he looked pretty comfortable against Scott Boland as the pacer castled his stumps earlier.
Earlier on Day 4, it was Alex Carey’s great brilliance as the crafty left-handed batsman played a fine 66-run slam from 105 balls and hit 8 fours. Mitchell Starc also chipped in with a handy slam of 41 runs off 57 balls and scored 7 fours as Starc dictated the terms.
ICC World Trial Championship Final | Dream11 Prediction | Fantasy Cricket Tips | Today’s Cricket Match Prediction | cricket news | Live cricket score | Asian Cup 2023 | ICC Cricket World Cup 2023 | IND vs. AFG 2023 | IND vs WI 2023
Scott Boland was bowling the eighth over India’s run chase and in the first delivery Shubman Gill tried to guide the ball past the gully fielder but failed to time it correctly and Cameron Green took an impressive catch.
Also Read: WTC Finale: WATCH: Crowd erupts with ‘cheater, cheater’ chants as Cameron Green was introduced to bowling following controversial Shubman Gill sack
The decision was sent up to the third referee and amazingly, referee Richard Kettleborough gave it despite footage suggesting the ball had touched the ground. Both Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill were shocked by the decision, as Shubman Gill was ruled out for 18 runs off 19 balls.
ICC World Trial Championship Final | World Trade Center End 2023 | IND vs. AUS 2023 | India national cricket team | IND vs. AFG 2023 | IND vs WI 2023 | Asian Cup 2023 | ICC World Cup 2023
Also Read: WTC Finale: Revealed: Why referees didn’t use a soft signal to make a decision on Shubman Gill’s controversial sacking
The decision was wrong: Harbhajan Singh on controversial dismissal of Shubman Gill
Harbhajan Singh was having an interaction with Star Sports and stated that the third referee’s decision was completely wrong and said that the referee should have taken a bit more time before making the decision.
– Star Sports (@StarSportsIndia) June 10, 2023
“According to me, it is not out. Why didn’t the referee zoom when the situation was to zoom, because you have the technology and the cameras and we have all the little things available?
“These things will help in decision making. The decision was wrong and the referee should have taken a little more time. The ball was between the two fingers and then the two fingers weren’t there.”
LPI 2023 | Dream11 Prediction | Fantasy Cricket Tips | Today’s Cricket Match Prediction | cricket news | Live cricket score
“The ball touched the surface, how can it happen. If the two fingers have not touched the and if the referee was not sure, then it should have been a no-out.” added.
Also Read: ICC World Test Championship Final: ‘IPL Talent Gets Exposed In The Oval’: Fans Criticize Shubman Gill Following Disaster Innings In WTC Final